Listening to “The Cost of Fast Fashion”, and then reading “How Depression-Era Women Made Dresses out of Chicken Feed”, made me easily contrast their methodology to their audiences. When I read the article, the writer of the post, Rebecca Onion used a lot of historical facts and photographic evidence to back up the information she was telling her readers. The tone of the article was very informational, linear, and straight forward with the facts. The article made it very easy to read and pay attention to. Rebecca Onion had consistency on the having the same two sources for the photographic resources, but also cited many scholarly books, which made this article very credible. The article felt like a crash-course on an idea of fashion and on an interesting take as to how certain trends came to be beck in the 1900s.
Whereas when listening to the podcast, because the speakers are friends, it was much more laid-back and a casual conversation. The way the ladies segway into the sources and back up their information is very smoothly, they include environmental sources, statistics, numbers, and credit researchers made. However, they don’t go into many details on what or who the sources are, but that was why the podcast just felt very conversational and easy-going. What I picked up from the podcast was two people trying to educate each other and the listeners but not to source the podcast as a form of proof or resource when speaking on the same subject to other people. The genre of the podcast is to inform each other, but also the listeners about subjects that is not normally talked about to a certain extent. It is meant to be very light-hearted and comical in a way, since they do not have any expertise in fashion in general.